Awaiting accurate scientific evidence: Progression or “profiles” in bipolar disorder?

Diego J. Martino; Cecilia Samamé; Sergio A. Strejilevich

doi:10.1186/s40345-017-0087-3

Awaiting accurate scientific evidence: Progression or “profiles” in bipolar disorder?

Diego J. Martino
, Cecilia Samamé
, Sergio A. Strejilevich

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

This letter is written in response to a review recently published in the journal. The aim is to highlight a potential methodological limitation common to many studies comparing bipolar patients with few previous episodes versus those with multiple episodes, and in which the results are interpreted as indicating the longitudinal course of the illness.

Original language	English
Article number	14
Journal	International Journal of Bipolar Disorders
Volume	5
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1186/s40345-017-0087-3
State	Published - 1 Dec 2017
Externally published	Yes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

Bipolar disorder
Neuroprogression
Response to treatment
Staging

Access to Document

10.1186/s40345-017-0087-3

Cite this

@article{cbc455796ee6469586eb785b78cc1f42,

title = "Awaiting accurate scientific evidence: Progression or “profiles” in bipolar disorder?",

abstract = "This letter is written in response to a review recently published in the journal. The aim is to highlight a potential methodological limitation common to many studies comparing bipolar patients with few previous episodes versus those with multiple episodes, and in which the results are interpreted as indicating the longitudinal course of the illness.",

keywords = "Bipolar disorder, Neuroprogression, Response to treatment, Staging",

author = "Martino, \{Diego J.\} and Cecilia Samam{\'e} and Strejilevich, \{Sergio A.\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017, The Author(s).",

year = "2017",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1186/s40345-017-0087-3",

language = "Ingl{\'e}s",

volume = "5",

journal = "International Journal of Bipolar Disorders",

issn = "2194-7511",

publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Awaiting accurate scientific evidence

T2 - Progression or “profiles” in bipolar disorder?

AU - Martino, Diego J.

AU - Samamé, Cecilia

AU - Strejilevich, Sergio A.

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - This letter is written in response to a review recently published in the journal. The aim is to highlight a potential methodological limitation common to many studies comparing bipolar patients with few previous episodes versus those with multiple episodes, and in which the results are interpreted as indicating the longitudinal course of the illness.

AB - This letter is written in response to a review recently published in the journal. The aim is to highlight a potential methodological limitation common to many studies comparing bipolar patients with few previous episodes versus those with multiple episodes, and in which the results are interpreted as indicating the longitudinal course of the illness.

KW - Bipolar disorder

KW - Neuroprogression

KW - Response to treatment

KW - Staging

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85032920441

U2 - 10.1186/s40345-017-0087-3

DO - 10.1186/s40345-017-0087-3

M3 - Carta

AN - SCOPUS:85032920441

SN - 2194-7511

VL - 5

JO - International Journal of Bipolar Disorders

JF - International Journal of Bipolar Disorders

IS - 1

M1 - 14

ER -

Awaiting accurate scientific evidence: Progression or “profiles” in bipolar disorder?

Abstract

UN SDGs

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this