Abstract
The professionalization of politics and the disappearance of party organizations based on activists seems an inescapable trend. This article shows, by studying the Broad Front of Uruguay as a deviant case, the relevance of organizational rules for explaining the reproduction of party activism. Using data from both an online survey of people differing in their levels of engagement with the Broad Front and in-depth interviews with party activists, we show that those with relatively low levels of engagement—“adherents”—and activists differ in their willingness to cooperate with the party and in the time they devote to party activities. Also, we find that reducing the perceived efficacy of political engagement strongly decreases activists’ self-reported willingness to engage with the party, while this reduction has no effect upon adherents. These findings suggest that the design of organizational rules that grant a political role to grassroots organizers can promote party activism.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 838-867 |
| Number of pages | 30 |
| Journal | Comparative Political Studies |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 May 2019 |
Keywords
- Latin American politics
- efficacy
- party activists
- party organization
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy and the Reproduction of Political Activism: Evidence From the Broad Front in Uruguay'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver