TY - JOUR
T1 - From Safety Net to Safety Trap
T2 - Informality and Telework During the Coronavirus Pandemic in Latin America
AU - de los Santos, Daniela
AU - Fynn, Inés
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 SAGE Publications.
PY - 2024/7
Y1 - 2024/7
N2 - In Latin America, informality has historically operated as a safety net during economic crises, by absorbing unemployed workers and providing income. However, unlike past economic crises, the 2020 crisis unleashed by the outbreak of the new coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) is not only economic but has resulted from a health emergency that requires social distance and isolation. In this article we argue that, in the context of social distancing and confinement measures, informal work constitutes a safety trap instead of operating as a safety net. First, informality as an economic subsistence mechanism is limited given that working activities in the informal sector are less convertible to remote jobs. Second, even when telework may be a viable option, the home conditions of informal workers often hinder the feasibility of telework. In making this argument, we bring to bear a conceptualization of potential to telework which includes both occupational and household components, the latter an often-neglected piece of the telework puzzle. To evaluate our argument, we conduct a quantitative cross-country analysis of seven Latin American countries (Bolivia, Chile, Ecuador, El Salvador, Mexico, Peru, and Uruguay). The empirical analysis consists of a descriptive assessment of the potential to telework of informal workers.
AB - In Latin America, informality has historically operated as a safety net during economic crises, by absorbing unemployed workers and providing income. However, unlike past economic crises, the 2020 crisis unleashed by the outbreak of the new coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) is not only economic but has resulted from a health emergency that requires social distance and isolation. In this article we argue that, in the context of social distancing and confinement measures, informal work constitutes a safety trap instead of operating as a safety net. First, informality as an economic subsistence mechanism is limited given that working activities in the informal sector are less convertible to remote jobs. Second, even when telework may be a viable option, the home conditions of informal workers often hinder the feasibility of telework. In making this argument, we bring to bear a conceptualization of potential to telework which includes both occupational and household components, the latter an often-neglected piece of the telework puzzle. To evaluate our argument, we conduct a quantitative cross-country analysis of seven Latin American countries (Bolivia, Chile, Ecuador, El Salvador, Mexico, Peru, and Uruguay). The empirical analysis consists of a descriptive assessment of the potential to telework of informal workers.
KW - COVID-19
KW - economic cycles
KW - informality
KW - telework
KW - teleworkable occupations
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149483925&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/00027642231155365
DO - 10.1177/00027642231155365
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:85149483925
SN - 0002-7642
VL - 68
SP - 1032
EP - 1051
JO - American Behavioral Scientist
JF - American Behavioral Scientist
IS - 8
ER -