TY - JOUR
T1 - Social support in unaccompanied asylum-seeking boys
T2 - A case study
AU - Mels, Cindy
AU - Derluyn, I.
AU - Broekaert, E.
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - Background: The situation of unaccompanied asylum-seeking children (UASC) is characterized by a substantial disruption of the social network and loss of parental support, seriously jeopardizing their psychological well-being. However, little is known about the role of social support in the lives of UASC. Methods: Twelve UASC completed a social support instrument and interview exploring perceived social support and what this implies for both buffering and main effects of social support. Results: Asylum centre staff and the ethnic community were the most important resources of support. High importance was ascribed to social companionship as a way of coping. Despite pro-social efforts towards Belgian peers, this group provided hardly any social support. Conclusions: The provision of social support could enhance UASC's well-being through buffering effects (e.g. social companionship as avoidant/distractive coping) and main effects (acceptance by Belgian peers enhancing self-esteem). The asylum centre shows a great potential to stimulate UASC's psychological well-being by expanding the psychosocial function of staff members and community treatment.
AB - Background: The situation of unaccompanied asylum-seeking children (UASC) is characterized by a substantial disruption of the social network and loss of parental support, seriously jeopardizing their psychological well-being. However, little is known about the role of social support in the lives of UASC. Methods: Twelve UASC completed a social support instrument and interview exploring perceived social support and what this implies for both buffering and main effects of social support. Results: Asylum centre staff and the ethnic community were the most important resources of support. High importance was ascribed to social companionship as a way of coping. Despite pro-social efforts towards Belgian peers, this group provided hardly any social support. Conclusions: The provision of social support could enhance UASC's well-being through buffering effects (e.g. social companionship as avoidant/distractive coping) and main effects (acceptance by Belgian peers enhancing self-esteem). The asylum centre shows a great potential to stimulate UASC's psychological well-being by expanding the psychosocial function of staff members and community treatment.
KW - Psychological well-being
KW - Social support
KW - Unaccompanied asylum-seeking children
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54949134793&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2008.00883.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2008.00883.x
M3 - Artículo
C2 - 18959574
AN - SCOPUS:54949134793
SN - 0305-1862
VL - 34
SP - 757
EP - 762
JO - Child: Care, Health and Development
JF - Child: Care, Health and Development
IS - 6
ER -